Sunday, March 8, 2009

An "Enterprise" Solution for Drug Users

This BBC article suggests a very interesting way of deterring drug users away from their drug habits. Considering a large percentage of Fortune's community are or were substance abusers, the thoughts in this article are highly relevant. 
"The key issue is not the availability of drugs, but rather the problematic drug use caused by social exclusion." This takeaway reinforces the need for us to address the social environment in which Fortune operates. Therefore, bringing emphasis on how much we have to ensure that our service suggestions for Fortune will provide social support for the clients, within the physical Fortune walls, but also outside in their communities. For example, from what we have heard about the Castle, the Castle seems to have breached the physical walls and created a strong support system for clients within the neighborhood community.
The suggestion that the article brings forth is regarding business: "Studies have shown how that "taking care of business" gives motivation, meaning and structure to a drug user's day." Essentially, they suggest and give examples of success stories, of how helping drug users to start up businesses is a good distraction away from the drugs. Thus, what many drug help groups, globally, have done are provide business incubator services or business education. I think that helping people start up a business is a valid idea because it encompasses a whole set of needs, including financials, sense of ownership and pride, a passionate project, and so on. 

BBC News, "Addicts need 'enterprise solution', March 24, 2002, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1889580.stm

Friday, March 6, 2009

Queensbridge Housing Projects: A look at the largest housing projects in North America




Safe, scared, un-welcomed, and content are just a few of the feelings one can expect to experience when they walk through the streets of Long Island City, Queens. An area that is troubled with a strange paradox of new versus old, L.I.C. is a place that seems to bustle one minute with new life, while having shades of emptiness lingering in the shadows. Through an almost troubling journey through the city, I took intrigue in the Queensbridge Housing Projects located in the Northwestern part of L.I.C. The “Bridge” as most Queens natives refer to it, is the largest housing project in North America opened in 1939 with 3,142 units. The New York Housing Authority owns these projects that occupy almost 7,000 individuals. “The Bridge” brings its residents a large sense of community, yet is raided with crime. Residents here don’t know whether to feel safe or to stay locked indoors, a feeling that is all too familiar, as it proves reminiscent of the one I myself experienced in the city, which begs the question: is there a parallel between life in “the bridge” and life in L.I.C? Furthermore, is there a relationship between these projects and the Fortune Society?

In the 1950’s, it was mandated that any family in the Queensbridge housing projects with an income of over $3,000 had to move out. The majority of these people were Caucasian, leaving the projects, which was once a blend of all ethnicities and races, to have a heavily populated African-American community. It was this majority of African-American’s that caused any Caucasian family still living in the projects to leave due to uncomfortable feelings. Still, with “the bridge” populated mostly by African-American’s and Hispanics, there was a strong sense of community. Selena M. Blake, a former resident of the Queensbridge Housing Projects, wanted to bring awareness to this sense of community in her documentary Queensbridge: The Other Side. Several residents and former residents interviewed in the documentary also had a lot to say about the community noting things such as “the doors were never locked,” “black, white, Hispanic, it didn’t matter, it was great,” and “everybody got along.” An argument she raises in the film is this paradox between misery and community. If the projects are to be a place filled with crime and unsafe feelings, than what’s the explanation for the long waiting lists? which Selena attributes is due to a community feeling over families that are just in need and on the edge of poverty.

While Selena’s documentary shows a time where the projects was a safe place to raise your kids despite the crime, it still doesn’t answer why the crime is there in the first place. In fact, just recently in early February of 2009, 59 people between the ages of 17 and 68 were arrested on charges of narcotics and firearm trafficking. Councilman and chair of the Public Safety Commission, Peter Vallone Jr., noted “these types of arrest are both dangerous and difficult, but well worth the effort.” Where do these people go? We place them in jail and prisons, where they will then face a life afterwards that, as we’ve seen from the Fortune Society, isn’t as easy as the life they have in prison because there are new challenges to face in being a formerly incarcerated individual.

In another short clip of Queensbridge: The Other Side, one man gives a powerful message when he talks about how society today categorizes people as ‘project people,’ that society doesn’t see the councilman, the mothers and the fathers, they see the projects. This brings an issue very closely related to the Fortune Society in that society today categorizes formerly incarcerated individuals as just that, not John, or Joe. Selena Blake once said about her documentary, “If kids today will say 'I don't have to feel bad because I'm from the projects,' it will be worth it.” In working with Next F Project, it puts organisations like the Fortune Society in perspective; if formerly incarcerated individuals can say ‘I don’t have to feel bad because I am a formerly incarcerated individual,’ because of the Fortune Society, than I think we can all say, Fortune’s worth it.


______________________________________________

New York City Housing Authority, “Factsheet”, December 2, 2008.

Burger, John; Her Film Project Happens to be Her Project; New York Times, December 2005

Leonard, Paul; Drug and Gun Bust at Queensbridge Houses, Queens Chronicle, February 12, 2009

Queensbridge: The Other Side film clip, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSgPBRZYgWo

Saturday, February 28, 2009

Friday, February 27, 2009

Tara's culture hunt

Following the cultural hunt in Long Island City, Queens on an early Wednesday morning, I left feeling rather perplexed about the complex situation of the area. Much of what I saw, made me question how things had come to be, historically, socially and logistically. There seemed to be such stark contrasts in all aspects of the site.
After some reflection, I decided to research the lack of urban planning of the area and the consequent social dichotomy. First and foremost, there was a saturation of research linking poor urban planning and urban decay to an endless list of social costs, including lower living standards and crime. Much of this research is rooted in the field of environmental psychology. The United Nations reports that a global trend shows that “there is increasing evidence that poor planning, design and management of the urban environment puts citizens at risk of death, injury and loss of property.” Furthermore, “it has been estimated that 10 to 15 percent of crimes have environmental design and management components.” Thus, this brings to mind, the extent to which newly freed inmates, who are dropped off in the midst of Long Island City, stand a chance of keeping out of trouble. Not to mention, the prison environment is not exactly one in which, one can recoup comfortably.
An article that I found in the New York Times, tells the journey of the ex-inmates’ first moments of freedom at the drop-off point in Queens Plaza. The article entitled “Life on Freedom Street” tells a story, which is almost a paradox to the term freedom; at once, they are welcomed by “merchants peddling goods both legal and illegal,” “temptations,” and other features that leave them nothing but vulnerable to the possibility of re-incarceration. Furthermore, the physical environment itself is not one that suggests a clean slate in life. At first glance, the bus off-loaders find themselves in the shadows of “an iron canopy, rusting above a slick of donut shops and strip clubs,”
Ultimately, the new taste of freedom is quickly filled with risk and unkind opportunity.
Not only is this an experience associated with those more vulnerable to a life in crime. Even the average, not formally incarcerated civilians of the area have concerns. In a letter to the editor of The Queens Gazette paper, local Megan Dees advocates for a revival of the city through urban planning. She describes the area to be “blighted and dangerous” and expresses her concerns about the lack of desire of the neighborhood. “A pedestrian must have a reason to cross the plaza. There is none right now. You can get a donut and a lap dance on both the north and south sides of the plaza. This is a menacing place.”
In all, these stories and descriptions, have left me to wonder how newly freed inmates could possibly fare in such an environment where they are left to fend through all the temptations, despite a psychological vulnerability. Thus, it relates to the Fortune Society and its services because as we move forward in service design for the Fortune, we must consider that the walls within the society are isolated and contrasted to the habitat the clients will spend their daily routines in. It is essential to understand how to help them not only when they are within the walls of the Fortune Society but also as they face the persuasions of the environment outside. In conclusion, environmental psychology is both important within and outside of the walls of the Fortune society. If we do not have full control of the environment outside, what can we do to ensure that the psychology of our client’s are not vulnerable as they explore outside of Fortune’s walls?



Dees, Megan. Letter to the editor, March 21, 2007. http://www.qgazette.com/news/2007/0321/Editorial_pages/008.html.

Fifield, Adam. “Life on Freedom Street.” NYtimes.com, December 23, 2001, http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9403E4D71E3EF930A15751C1A9679C8B63&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=3.

Roleke, John. Jumble of Overhead Tracks in Queens Plaza. http://queens.about.com/od/longislandcity/ig/Long-Island-City-Photos/Queens-Plaza.htm.

United Nations Human Settlements Programme. Enhancing Urban Safety and Security: Global Report on Human Settlements 2007. Earthscan, 2007.